Compared with stronger drugs like heroin and cocaine, cannabis, in form of oil, concentrates, or even auto flowering seeds, and other derived products are considered a soft drug with minimal to addiction. In the year 1800’s, it was one of the most valuable crops in the American region to the commonwealth, but it has been banned to grow in most nations since the 1900’s.
Compared with stronger drugs like heroin and cocaine, cannabis, in form of oil, concentrates, and other derived products are considered a soft drug with minimal to addiction. In the year 1800’s, it was one of the most valuable crops in the American region to the commonwealth, but it has been banned to grow in most nations since the 1900’s.
Given the lament for the decriminalization of the personal possession of small quantities of marijuana is growing and the dilemma of black-market drugs is increased in the scene, the proposal of legalizing marijuana has been discussed among the governments.
The beginning
With the increment in the number of middle-class users in the 1960s and 1970s, there came a moderately greater acceptance of the view that cannabis should not be viewed in the same class as narcotics. The Drug Abuse Prevention Act of 1970 reduced the federal penalties, and 11 states decriminalized possession.
However, in the late 1980s, many states revised their drug laws and forced stricter sanctions. Beginning in 1996, however, a series of states started enacting medical marijuana laws, and in 2012 voters in the states of Colorado and Washington supported the legalization of marijuana.
Adversaries of curing marijuana laws have stated that it is an intoxicant less controllable than alcohol, that the drug-using society does not need another widely used drug, and that the United States should not act to minimize UN policies, which are contrary to the use of marijuana for other than potential medical purposes.
In 2013, Uruguay became the first nation to legalize the use of marijuana, growing marijuana seeds, and selling, a sign of progress that undertook in part to weaken drug cartels. Uruguay’s legalization, which was a source of controversy in the country, also was scrutinized by international authorities for contradicting treaties to which Uruguay was a party.
Given the lament for the decriminalization of the personal possession of small quantities of marijuana is growing and the dilemma of black-market drugs is increased in the scene, the proposal of legalizing marijuana has been discussed among the governments.
Weighing up the pros and cons of legalizing cannabis
A lot of studies try to weigh up the pros and cons of legalizing cannabis from the viewpoint of the economic concern and the reduction in crime rate. Also, the aspect of hazard to human’s health and the impediment to the youth’s progress so that a reasonable and justifiable evaluation can be finally taken out. Legalizing cannabis is advantageous to the increase of government income and the reduction of its expense.
Legalization of marijuana is an opportunity that has not taken a possibility but should be given one. Although various people, both from the government and private individuals feel that legalizing marijuana would develop the amount of use and abuse.
Cannabis, when legalized, it will reduce the significant expenses of money on drug enforcement, and it will improve the country’s revenue. Driven by the significant interest rates, entrepreneurs have smuggled cannabis through customs.
As a settlement, customs tax, as an indispensable contributor to the state revenue, has been evaded by the black-market entrepreneurs. Assuming that marijuana is legalized, businesses should pay tax under the state law, which will unquestionably bring the additional profits to the government.
Look at the Netherlands as an illustration, the proportion of marijuana and its associated products or services contributing to the gross domestic product (GDP) reached two percent in 2007.
Moreover, legalizing marijuana can decrease public investment from the state, for instance, economic costs on law enforcement, prison administration, and public safety. Thus, the additional income and reduced expenses can be dedicated to sanitation, public health, and education. Furthermore, legalizing marijuana will be favorable to decreasing the incidence of drug-related crimes. Growing and buying auto flowering seeds online, production, and possession are arraigned on drug charges in most of the countries.
In different countries, the drug policies are different, and not all the states have legalized the distribution of marijuana.
Although, according to the amount and scope of these exercises, most of the state governments have convinced that it is feasible to arbitrate them differently.
If personal use of marijuana is legalized due to its harmlessness to the society, consumers may favor to legally obtain marijuana from authorized stores and enterprises rather than committing crimes for purchasing it from an illegal source.
With the supervision from the government, the social and individual safety will be ensured, and the crime rate can be correspondingly reduced. However, from another point of view, legalizing marijuana is unfavorable and unacceptable. Researches have proved that there is a close relationship linking with the incident of some diseases and the use of marijuana. Doctors have pointed out that Marijuana use is connected with the respiratory and mental illness and is toxic to the cognitive and immune system. Additionally, smoking weed increases the risk of lung cancer.
The end
Legalizing marijuana is certainly a double-edged knife. On the one hand, it will produce an economic return to the government and is contributive to the standardization of drug businesses and the reduction in the crime rate. On the other hand, using marijuana poses a hazard to people’s well-being and is detrimental to adolescents. Therefore, what should be noticed is that it is by no means a remedy to any social difficulties or unmitigated harm to the human being. To an extent, the outcomes depend on the circumstances of the new legal regime and the other insurgent factors.
